‘Burning’ Historical Questions

The Trust launched a new initiative, calling for submissions from members of the public, researchers and thinkers to send in 'burning' historical questions which could feature and be answered in our Notes & Queries section of a future edition of the Gibraltar Heritage Journal. We asked for thought-provoking questions which had not been discussed, explored or answered in the wider literature of Gibraltar's history. 

We would like to thank everyone who submitted a question and are pleased to share some of our findings and answers to your questions below. Others may feature in upcoming Journals.

Q&As:
 

01.  Where does the name “Gibraltar” originate? (from A. Freeman)


A: Gibraltar is popularly supposed to be named after Tarik ibn Zeyad, the Berber Muslim general who is supposed to have landed in or near Gibraltar on the way to conquer Visigothic Spain. The Arabic “Gebel-Tarik” or “Gebel-al-tarik” (Mountain of Tarik) was contracted over the years to the present “Gibraltar.”

Other origins have been suggested.1

02.  Why does the name “Gibraltar” contain the word “altar” in it? (from A. Freeman)


A: Nothing to do with the English word ‘altar.’ It’s simply the retained syllables of ‘al-tarik.’

03.  Why is the landmass where Spain and Gibraltar are located called the Iberian peninsula instead of the Spanish peninsula? (from A. Freeman)


A: The Greeks gave the peninsula the name “Iberia,” probably from the river Ebro (they had a trading post nearby called Empurios – hence the word “Emporium”. Later the Romans called it “Hispania”, probably from the Phoenician name which means “Land of Rabbits.” The original Greek name is preferred, as it does not imply that the whole peninsula belongs to one nation.

Fun fact: The Hebrew name for the peninsula is Ha-Sepharad, and the Hebrew consonants in the name ( H – S - Ph – R - D ) are very similar to the Greek HeSPeRiDes – the islands where Heracles found the golden apples – Seville Oranges, maybe!

04.  Why is Gibraltar referred to as an “encampment”? (from A. Freeman)


A: It isn’t.

05.  Why is the land area to the north of Gibraltar referred to as “El Campo de Gibraltar” (the Camp of Gibraltar)? (from A. Freeman)


A: “Campo” is not “camp” in Spanish, but refers to fields or an area of land. The “Campo de Gibraltar” was the area administered by the City of Gibraltar in Spanish times. The name of the village of Campamento does refer to the encampment of Spanish/French troops during the Great Siege.


1 Sassoon, H. “Two views of the Arab invasion and Tariq/Tarif.” Gibraltar Heritage Journal, Vol 10, p. 5;

      Benady, S. What’s in a name? Origin of the name ‘Gibraltar’ revisited. Gibraltar Heritage Journal, Vol. 22. p. 7.

(all answers by Sam Benady)

*********************************************************************************************

06. Gibraltar under the rule of Archduke Charles (from Martí Crespo)
I would like to focus on how the dominion of Archduke Charles of Austria over Gibraltar evolved from its capture in 1704 until the transfer of sovereignty to Queen Anne in 1713. From the first period, that of the occupation and defence of the fortress under the orders of Prince George of Hesse-Darmstadt, we have a contemporary source, that of the diary of Captain Francisco de Casamitjana. It is a source which is detailed but nevertheless not generally known.
With the departure of Prince George and the majority of the Catalan and Castilian soldiers and volunteers who accompanied him, the control of the Pretender to the Spanish throne over the fortress weakened further to the benefit of the British military authorities, who came to dominate it de facto and, after the Treaty of Utrecht, de jure. However, in this second stage, evidence emerges from time to time that shows us the survival of the Austrian structure on the Rock, especially at the political and civil government level, such as the presence of Judge Alonso de la Capela and the alcayde de mar Josep Corrons, both appointed by Prince George just before embarking for Barcelona in 1705, and maintained in their position quite a few years after Utrecht.
My proposal, therefore, is to investigate more deeply this transcendental stage of the Rock, the true germ of the current British Gibraltar.


A: The period 1705-1712 is a confusing period in Gibraltar's history, but this publication has already published two of my studies: "The Early Governors I," in issue 9, and "The Depositions of the Spanish Inhabitants to the Inspectors of the Army in 1712," in issue 6.

The latter also appeared in Almoraima 13, and I will present some clarifications of the former at the upcoming Jornadas de Historia next April. My work is based on papers from the British National Archive, the British Library, and the Archivio di Statto di Genova. According to the book, "The First Peninsular War," by A.D. Francis, there is nothing of interest in the Vienna archives, but I may be mistaken.
If you find anything else of interest, the Journal is willing to study it. I'd like to take this opportunity to congratulate you on your book and thank you for your efforts to strengthen the ties between Menorca and Gibraltar. 

(By Tito Benady)

********************************************************************************************

07. Despite it being stipulated in the Treaty of Utrecht that it is not permitted, why does Gibraltar have such a long standing history of inhabitants from Jewish and Moorish ethnicity and/or religion? (from Jonathan Gonzalez)


A: Refer to article 'The Settlement of the Jews in Gibraltar, 1704-1738' in Gibraltar Heritage Journal Special Edition (2004).

*********************************************************************************************

08. I would like to know the exact position of the path goatherder Simon Rodrigues Susarte took on the Eastside to lead the Spanish army to the top of the rock. Apparently it was destroyed shortly after to prevent any recurrence. I’ve been up the Eastside catchments a few times and use med steps regularly so this is of interest to me and no one has been to answer this. Maybe we could rebuild the path for day trips! (from Stephen Shacaluga)


A: The goatherd’s path was the subject of an article I wrote in the Heritage Trust Journal No 18 (2011). The story in a nutshell is that there was a weak spot at Middle Hill behind Catalan Bay that could be taken from the slopes on the Eastside if it was not defended. Susarte knowing the paths around the Rock led what was effective a small raiding party of 500 Spanish soldiers to capture Middle Hill using a route that went along Sandy Bay and along the cliffs to where Monkey’s Cave is today. This location was called the ‘pass of the locust trees’ or ‘el paso del algarrobo’ which is identified (34) on a map in the Gentleman’s Magazine of March 1762. This pass was subsequently scarped by the British and a guard house built near Monkey’s Cave, both confirmed by James and Drinkwater. The attack by Susarte was initially successful but unfortunately for his companions, the French did not follow through with the agreed assault from Catalan Bay and the raiders were abandoned to their fate.  Given the extensive quarrying of the slopes behind Catalan Bay and Sandy Bay in the building of the dockyard it would not be possible to recreate either path.

Key to Map:

Yellow – Spanish

34 – ‘el paso  del algarrobo’

35 – St Michael’s Cave (Stayed the night)

37 – Signal Station – Killed the guard

38 – Middle Hill guard captured

Red – French - Intended route up slope behind Catalan Bay

(By Roy Clinton)

***********************************************************************************************

09: On 5th April 1942, HMS Vidette was sent to escort two Italian tankers, the Taigete and the Arcola into Algeciras Bay. Back out at sea, HMS Vidette met two Italian liners, the Vulcania and the Saturnia, and escorted them into the Bay. Later that day, the two tankers were allowed to leave the Bay, and the following day, so too the liners. On 11th April, HMS Vidette escorted two Italian battleships, the Duilio and the Giulio Cesare into the Bay. I believe they were allowed to leave later, perhaps the following day.
What was all this about? I have tried to find an answer from Gibraltar Heritage, The Imperial War Museum, London, and from other researchers. It is as if it never happened. Obviously, my father did not invent this episode of the war, and it is not difficult to guess what was going on, but the absolute wall of silence is a little odd after all this time. Can you throw any light on it? (from Geoff Morgan)


A: The two liners were in Gibraltar by an arrangement through the Red Cross that a large number of Italian women and children in Somalia who were in Prisoner of War Camps should be repatriated. In Gibraltar each ship picked up an armed military group to ensure they stuck to the agreed course. They were not allowed through the Suez Canal in case of sabotage and had a long journey round Africa, therefore tankers were also sent to refuel them.

(By Tito Benady)

************************************************************************************************

10. As a key port, did Gibraltar have any link to the slave trade? Are there any accounts of Slaves in Gibraltar; does not have to be specifically African American slaves. (from Bayside History Students)

A. 

Slaves in Gibraltar

When Gibraltar was ruled by the Muslims there were no doubt slaves in Gibraltar. These would have been largely European Christians, especially from the Iberian peninsula. When Gibraltar was captured by Castile in 1462, there were no doubt slaves, but these would have been Muslims from Granada or North Africa, and maybe some Jews.

The Archives of the Diocese of Cadiz 1 have numerous mentions of slaves: for example, in page 100 we have the marriage of Juan Caballero and Ana González born in Angola. Both were slaves, and their ‘owners’ were citizens of Gibraltar.

After 1704, there is some evidence of slaves living in Gibraltar, but they probably were not many. 2 The 1777 census in the Gibraltar Government Archives records (in the list of Jewish inhabitants) one Bumper “a negroe” aged 40, from Guinea, but he is not recorded as a slave and was probably a paid servant.

The Slave Trade

Gibraltar was never directly involved in the slave trade, but slaver ships on the way to Africa would call in at Gibraltar to stock up with trade goods such as linens, as British goods were prized above others by the Africans who sold their captives to the slave traders.

When Britain abolished the slave trade, this practice had to stop, and in 1829 Lieutenant Governor Sir George Don decreed that any ship suspected of being a slaver was banned from provisioning in Gibraltar, and the British Consuls in Cadiz and other Spanish ports (where the ships were outfitted with the necessary shackles and chains) were ordered to report any suspicious ships which might be heading for Gibraltar, and such ships were rigorously examined when they arrived. 3

Fun Fact: Mrs Elizabeth Robinson, a long-time resident in Gibraltar, travelled to London and was the first woman ever to give evidence in the House of Lords – on slave trafficking! There is no indication, though, that her evidence concerned Gibraltar. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_the_House_of_Lords)


1 Anton Solé, P. Catálogo de la sección “Gibraltar” del archivo histórico diocesano de Cadiz 1518-1806. Cadiz, 1979.

2 Garcia, RJM. Ordinary Life in Peace and War. RJMG Books, Gibraltar,2021, p. 145.

3 Benady, S.  General Sir George Don. Gibraltar Books, 2006, pp. 105-106.

(By Sam Benady)

**************************************************************************************************